Offworld Trading Company

Cerlin · Feb 17, 2015

This is a game. A RTS. With no combat. Multiplayer/single player/skirmish. Its the best RTS I have played since Rise of Nations (Though Wargame ALB was not bad at all.)

This blog post from Tom Chick got me to buy it:
http://www.quartertothree.com/fp/20...-go-ahead-play-offworld-trading-company-beta/

Five reasons you should just go ahead and play the Offworld Trading Company beta
Tom Chick, February 12, 2015 | Features

I’m not in the habit of recommending, much less playing, early access games. I’d just as soon wait until a game is finished before playing it. It makes no sense to me that I’d jump into some form of entertainment while it’s still being made, any more than I’d eat lasagne before it’s been baked or move into a house before the roof was in place. “Hey Tom,” Joss Whedon might ask, “do you want to watch Avengers 2 now? I haven’t shot all the scenes, and the ending isn’t in yet, and there’s no CG yet for The Hulk. But here, you can watch what I’ve got so far!” What kind of deal is that? Why wouldn’t I wait until the movie comes out? Besides, I have plenty of finished movies I could watch.

It’s no different with games. So why would I play Offworld Trading Company, which enters public beta today and is available for $40 on Steam?

After the jump, it just takes one moment of weakness.

I booted up Offworld Trading Company real quick just to take a peek. It was mainly out of curiosity about how it looked rather than any desire to actually play it. The game had been announced for some time, and I’d heard people talk about playing early builds. But because the art still had a long way to go, people were asked not to post screenshots. So I had no idea what Offworld Trading Company looked like. I figured I’d boot it up real quick just to take a look. It looked pretty good. While I’m here, I thought, I might as well click on a few buttons and just see what happens.

That’s how I discovered that Offworld Trading Company is mostly complete. It works the same way a finished game works. It’s not like eating uncooked lasagne or living in a house where the rain gets in. It’s not like watching a movie in progress. It’s like playing a released RTS. Furthermore, a complete RTS. It has a skirmish mode, a (really good!) single-player campaign, and multiplayer support. These are the three things that any real time strategy game has to do, almost like three separate types of games in one box. And right now, Offworld Trading Company is doing all three of them just fine. Some of the buttons have placeholder graphics, but otherwise, it plays from start to finish like a completed game, without any conspicuous gaps or omissions.

Furthermore, Offworld Trading Company is a self-contained half-hour experience. I just happily uninstalled Darkest Dungeon after taking a quick peek. That game spans many hours, building up characters over several play sessions, guiding them through content that is currently incomplete. With several character classes and locations yet to be added, playing Darkest Dungeon’s early access version is only playing part of Darkest Dungeon. But for the most part, playing Offworld Trading Company’s currently available beta is playing the entirety of Offworld Trading Company. I get the sense that the things that will change are the things that will change between the release of Starcraft II and Starcraft II after several balance and tuning patches. Although the tuning is in progress, the basics of the game are done and they provide immensely satisfying RTS matches. When Starcraft II came out, did you opt not to play while waiting for Blizzard to work on patches?

But what about the sort of polish that you only find in finished games? I’m not sure that applies so much here, because Offworld Trading Company is mostly gameplay. I’ve written before that every RTS exists on a continuum between spectacle and skill. At one end you have the Hollywood war movie spectacle of Company of Heroes, and at the other end you have the intricate skill required to play Starcraft II. Company of Heroes requires skill as well, and Starcraft II can certainly look spectacular. But they’re at either end of the spectacle vs. skill spectrum in terms of their emphasis. Almost all RTSs exist somewhere on this spectrum.

But Offworld Trading Company is a strange beast. It looks good, but since it doesn’t include any combat, it eschews the traditional appeal of spectacle. Even though dynamite and underground nukes are available on the black market, nothing really blows up. The only claim to spectacle is an occasional parade of blimps carrying cargo. Offworld Trading Company is almost all skill. In fact, you don’t play by watching the map, which is where you find spectacle. You play by watching the market information along the right side of the screen. This is abetted by an interface created by Scott Lewis, the guy responsible for the interfaces in Rise of Nations and Rise of Legends, two of the finest interfaces your eyes and fingertips will ever enjoy.

So whatever polish is left to apply isn’t the sort of thing that leaves visual gaps. It’s not like watching a movie without CG sequences. There is obviously still work to do, but it’s all additive at this point. I can’t imagine any missing visuals that detract from the experience of playing Offworld Trading Company. And to Lewis’ credit, I’d even be hard pressed to complain much about the current interface. There are obviously more things that can be done to get Offworld Trading Company really dancing under your fingertips, but in its current state, it’s absolutely manageable, slick, and intuitive.

There aren’t many alternatives to Offworld Trading Company. After spending some time playing, I went looking for games that exist in the same space. I tried a few city builders, specifically Anno 2070 for its long elegant production chains and slick sci-fi motif. I tried Settlers 7 for its head-to-head competitive structure and boardgame conventions. I almost tried Sid Meier’s Railroads (another Scott Lewis interface, by the way) but thought better of it. Sid Meier’s Railroads was attempting the same thing as Offworld Trading Company: a relatively short and self-contained economic battle among players. But Sid Meier’s Railroads was a tangle of messy rail lines and dry gameplay.

I couldn’t find any way to download Stardock’s Entrepreneur and Corporate Machine games, which were also economic real time strategy games. But the game I most wanted to revisit, but I couldn’t find my copy and it doesn’t seem to be available for download anywhere, was ruthless.com, an unappreciated gem by Shadow Watch designer Kevin Perry. Ruthless.com — technically, it’s called Tom Clancy’s ruthless.com — was about competing software developers using dirty tricks and corporate espionage against each other. It was a turn-based game but so, too, is Offworld Trading Company when you consider that it proceeds in “ticks”. That the ticks run in real time is almost beside the point. You can freely pause and play Offworld Trading Company in single-player mode.

The playing pieces in ruthless.com were departments and skyscrapers deployed on a grid that represents the market and gives the gameplay a territory control element. But one of the things that sets Offworld Trading Company apart from so many other games is how it is decoupled from the concept of territory control, which is a tenet of most strategy games (and even most sports). Offworld Trading Company is about the resources instead of the map. Sure, the map dictates the availability of resources, and positioning is an important element in terms of how long it takes to get resources, or your options for adjacency bonuses, or placement of pirates and the use of patents like slant drilling. But conventional territory control has no role here. You’re not trying to seize terrain. How many strategy games can you say that about?

But one of the main reasons I recommend playing this beta is that Offworld Trading Company won’t be finished for another year. Well, “finished”. I mean, for Pete’s sake, the overwhelming sensation I get from this thing is that they should just slap a 1.0 in the corner of the screen and release it. I say that as an impatient consumer, by the way, and not as a critic, a guy who somewhat understands the process of game development, or a fan who wants Offworld Trading Company to be as good as it can possibly be. Those three aspects of myself are fine with the game being in development another year. It’s just the impatient consumer who wishes they would release it now. That’s the guy who’s going to be playing it off and on for the next year.
Click to expand...

Edit/Addition 1: This is the main developer playing through the tutorial. The youtube channel has him play all of them eventually and does some PVP too. It helps explain his thinking and a lot of mechanics.

Tanedin · Feb 15, 2015

Offworld shipment launched; look at all the money.

Cerlin · Feb 16, 2015

Tanedin said: ↑

Offworld shipment launched; look at all the money.
Click to expand...

More delicious words have never been heard.

I do still suck at the Robot and Science factions. I cannot seem to do well with them. The other two work alright for me though.

SheepHugger · Feb 16, 2015

Is it a massively multiplayer game? I saw it earlier and got that impression from some of the text.

I don't like multiplayer games that much right now. You can't pause them when a kid spills a bowl of cereals on the floor and I always end up not being present half the time.

Cerlin · Feb 16, 2015

The single player + AI is all I have played so far. It is an RTS like the old school ones so you can play in a multiplayer lobby but there is a single player and a campaign too. The game also has pause and speed functions for single player so Pausing and walking away for a while is no issues. The matches also only last 30 minutes (depending on map size) so the experience is nice and short.

StalaggtIKE · Feb 16, 2015

Interesting. I'll have to look more into this. Now what I really want is a RoN sequel.

Tanedin · Feb 17, 2015

Cerlin said: ↑

More delicious words have never been heard.

I do still suck at the Robot and Science factions. I cannot seem to do well with them. The other two work alright for me though.
Click to expand...

I think they're pretty balanced, expansive is definitely the easiest to play though. Science can be quite good since you can use their special ability to cut out an extra claim by jumping straight to steel on an iron tile, or straight to food on a water tile.

SheepHugger · Feb 17, 2015

Cerlin said: ↑

The single player + AI is all I have played so far. It is an RTS like the old school ones so you can play in a multiplayer lobby but there is a single player
Click to expand...

I was sold at this point.

Cerlin said: ↑

and bla bla. Bla bla bla has pause and speed function for single player so Pausing and walking away for a while is no issues. Bla bla bla bla bla 30 bla (bla bla bla bla) bla bla bla bla bla.
Click to expand...

COOL!
Sold even more!

(and sorry for the bla bla's, I was just highlighting the best parts, no offense )

Thanks for posting this game, I really need to ask it for ma borfday!
Honestly, I was just about done skipping the whole game thinking it was another MMO. Thanks for clearing that up. This is absolutely one of my all time favorite game categories.

Cerlin · Feb 17, 2015

Hah Sheep I understand.

I also needed a break from MMOs sometimes and I miss using the strategy/tactical parts of my gamer brain. I have played about 15 hours single player so far and at the employee (normal) difficulty and I still lose a good amount. The AI is challenging. From what I can see and from what I have read, it looks like the AI just gets faster and does not cheat like some games (Wargame Red Dragon I am looking at you!)

Tanedin said: ↑

I think they're pretty balanced, expansive is definitely the easiest to play though. Science can be quite good since you can use their special ability to cut out an extra claim by jumping straight to steel on an iron tile, or straight to food on a water tile.
Click to expand...

The Science Tutorial took me out. Expansion is pretty easy and I like scavenger. Robotic is very funky and Science is a good idea but I just cant figure out how to win often with it. I think the cool part playing multiplayer will be to learn new strategies for other HQs.

Tanedin · Feb 17, 2015

They deliberately made the map for the science tutorial more difficult because they wanted the last tutorial to be a challenge. Seems to me like they made it even harder than a regular quick match.
Biggest problem I have with it is how spread out everything is, making your fuel requirements really high until you can get teleportation.

SheepHugger · Feb 19, 2015

Tanedin said: ↑

They deliberately made the map for the science tutorial more difficult because they wanted the last tutorial to be a challenge. Seems to me like they made it even harder than a regular quick match.
Biggest problem I have with it is how spread out everything is, making your fuel requirements really high until you can get teleportation.
Click to expand...

Kind of reminds me when I was in charge of Barbarossa's logistics and it took 4 liters of fuel to get 1 liter of fuel to the front.
Then we ran across some camels in the southern front and started putting fuel on them.

Do they have camels on other planets?

Log in or Sign up

Offworld Trading Company

Cerlin Pug Wranlger Thrall

Tanedin New Guy Berserker

Cerlin Pug Wranlger Thrall

SheepHugger Well Liked Viking

Cerlin Pug Wranlger Thrall

StalaggtIKE Well Liked Viking

Tanedin New Guy Berserker

SheepHugger Well Liked Viking

Cerlin Pug Wranlger Thrall

Tanedin New Guy Berserker

SheepHugger Well Liked Viking

Log in or Sign up

Offworld Trading Company

Cerlin Pug Wranlger Thrall

Tanedin New Guy Berserker

Cerlin Pug Wranlger Thrall

SheepHugger Well Liked Viking

Cerlin Pug Wranlger Thrall

StalaggtIKE Well Liked Viking

Tanedin New Guy Berserker

SheepHugger Well Liked Viking

Cerlin Pug Wranlger Thrall

Tanedin New Guy Berserker

SheepHugger Well Liked Viking

Useful Searches